best online poker sites

Find the best online poker site for YOU!

Find the best online poker site for YOU!

official poker rankings

Calculating Tournament Bankroll Requirements

To demonstrate how much your results can deviate from the expected as the number of entries increases, we have calculated the standard deviation of winnings over 1,000 multiplayer poker tournaments for various field sizes, which we have summarized in the tables below.

Each table lists the minimum poker bankroll requirements for various expected ROI’s.

95% The number of buy-ins required to have a 95% chance to avoid going broke. Use this row to calculate your optimal buy-in if you can afford to replenish your bankroll from a secondary source of income.
99.7% The number of buy-ins required to have a 99.7% chance to avoid going broke. Use this row to calculate your optimal buy-in if you are unable to replenish your bankroll (and thus cannot afford to lose it all).

The standard deviation listed for each tournament size is the standard deviation of total profit/loss (in terms of buy-ins) after 1,000 tournaments for the samples analyzed for all ROIs. The larger this number is, the more your results may vary from the expected outcome. Your expected earnings (in terms of buy-ins) after 1,000 tournaments is equal to your ROI multiplied by 1,000. That is, if you have a 40% ROI, then after 1,000 tournaments you expect to win 400 buy-ins.

Unfortunately, the distribution of profit/loss after 1,000 tournaments is far from normal, so the empirical rule cannot be applied. That is, 95% of the results will not occur within 2 standard deviations of the average.

Win Chance The percentage of the samples that showed a profit after 1,000 tournaments for the given ROI and number of entries. Note that the win rate decreases as the number of entries increases. That is, you can be less assured of actually showing profit even if you are a winning player for each run of 1,000 tournaments. The lower the win rate, the longer it will be before you can be guaranteed to show a profit.
Avg. Low To further highlight the impact of the standard deviation, we have calculated the average profit (or loss) from the worst result from each group of 10 samples of 1,000 tournaments. In other words, there is a greater than 5% chance that your results will be worse than this amount!

The accuracy of the data decreases as the number of entries increases, so we ran more samples for the larger field tournaments to improve the accuracy of our results.

william hill poker

Heads-Up Tournament Bankroll Requirements

Standard Deviation = 31 buy-ins

ROI > 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
95% (buy-ins)
45.9 26.7 19.6 16.5 13.5 12.7 10.6 9.5
99.7% (buy-ins)
55.9 31.6 23.1 19.4 15.7 14.8 12.3 11.0
Win Chance 87% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Avg. Low (buy-ins)
-12 52 106 152 211 247 315 338

Based on the fees for a $100 buy-in heads-up PokerStars sit and go.

9-player Sit & Go Tournament Bankroll Requirements

Standard Deviation = 51 buy-ins

ROI > 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
95% (buy-ins) 74.1 52.0 41.5 34.1 29.0 23.8 21.1 20.3
99.7% (buy-ins) 90.6 63.2 49.4 40.2 34.0 27.5 24.5 23.7
Win Chance 82% 98% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Avg. Low (buy-ins) -37 30 68 129 172 223 273 321

Based on the fees and payout structure for a $10 buy-in 9-player sit & go at Full Tilt Poker, which pays 3 places (33.3%).

45-player Sit & Go Tournament Bankroll Requirements

Standard Deviation = 93 buy-ins

ROI > 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
95% (buy-ins) 157 120 107 91.2 80.3 68.9 66.7 58.1
99.7% (buy-ins) 193 146 130 110 96.0 81.6 80.7 68.8
Win Chance 72% 86% 96% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Avg. Low (buy-ins)
-81 -31 20 74 114 140 211 265

Based on the fees & payout structure for a $1 buy-in 45-player sit & go at PokerStars, which pays 7 places (15.6%).

90-player Sit & Go Tournament Bankroll Requirements

Standard Deviation = 115 buy-ins

ROI > 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
95% (buy-ins) 173 170 134 119 109 103 91.4 86.3
99.7% (buy-ins)
210 206 160 144 130 124 109 103
Win Chance 71% 82% 92% 97% 99% 100% 100% 100%
Avg. Low (buy-ins)
-115 -57 -9 35 72 130 153 184

Based on the fees and payout structure for a $2.50 buy-in 90-player sit & go at PokerStars, which pays 13 places (14.4%).

122-player Tournament Bankroll Requirements

Standard Deviation = 116 buy-ins

ROI > 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
95% (buy-ins)
181 154 128 121 98.5 89.9 77.8 67.2
99.7% (buy-ins) 220 188 156 147 118 109 91.9 78.7
Win Chance 61% 78% 89% 98% 99% 100% 100% 100%
Avg. Low (buy-ins)
-116 -68 -23 26 73 139 189 252

Based on the fees and payout structure for a $5.50 buy-in tournament at PokerStars with 122 entries that pays 13 places (10.7%).

bwin poker

243-player Tournament Bankroll Requirements

Standard Deviation = 160 buy-ins

ROI > 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
95% (buy-ins)
253 238 195 184 161 154 141 126
99.7% (buy-ins)
310 289 235 225 195 186 170 151
Win Chance 63% 76% 84% 90% 94% 98% 99.4% 99.8%
Avg. Low (buy-ins)
-168 -105 -73 -22 -1 77 108 153

Based on the fees and payout structure for a $16.50 buy-in tournament at PokerStars with 243 entries that pays 32 places (13.2%).

549-player Tournament Bankroll Requirements

Standard Deviation = 216 buy-ins

ROI > 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
95% (buy-ins)
353 312 301 258 233 219 198 188
99.7% (buy-ins)
435 380 370 311 282 265 240 227
Win Chance 57% 69% 75% 83% 86% 92% 93% 97%
Avg. Low (buy-ins)
-228 -187 -154 -101 -79 -25 0 54

Based on the fees and payout structure for a $5.50 buy-in tournament at PokerStars with 549 entries that pays 72 places (13.1%).

1,215-player Tournament Bankroll Requirements

Standard Deviation = 286 buy-ins

ROI > 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
95% (buy-ins)
429 392 363 326 312 289 253 238
99.7% (buy-ins)
519 477 441 397 379 353 305 287
Win Chance 54% 61% 66% 75% 81% 84% 89% 92%
Avg. Low (buy-ins)
-307 -277 -245 -163 -147 -122 -61 -43

Based on the fees and payout structure for a $5.50 buy-in tournament at PokerStars with 1,215 entries that pays 180 places (14.8%).

2,570-player Tournament Bankroll Requirements

Standard Deviation = 394 buy-ins

ROI > 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
95% (buy-ins)
513 485 444 413 401 374 347 325
99.7% (buy-ins)
618 584 537 498 490 456 423 395
Win Chance 51% 55% 57% 65% 72% 75% 78% 83%
Avg. Low (buy-ins)
-422 -364 -353 -322 -276 -203 -182 -134

Based on the fees and payout structure for The Big $16.50 at PokerStars with 2,570 entries that pays 324 places (12.6%).

Not only do larger fields reduce the percentage of your poker bankroll you can invest per tournament, but they also increase the number of tournaments you must play to guarantee you will show profit!

You may wish to add an additional 20% to our calculations for non-heads-up tournaments since the maximum downswings will not result in a normal distribution (making the empirical rule less accurate). However, if you have the discipline to drop down in buy-ins if your bankroll dwindles, you can also cut the required number of buy-ins in half. This will allow you to invest more of your poker bankroll per tournament, but will still give you the required number of buy-ins to protect yourself against going broke. Note that you MUST be disciplined for this approach to work. It’s awfully tempting to continue playing at a higher buy-in in an attempt to dig oneself out of a hole. However, this road leads to poker poverty!

Given that winning players typically win by finishing higher in the money than average, most winning players will earn higher ROI as the number of entries increases (since larger field tournaments also have a greater disparity in prize pool distribution). However, your increases in ROI need to offset the increased number of buy-ins required to avoid going broke. For example, if you can earn 10% ROI playing 9-player SNGs, then you would need to earn almost 20% ROI playing 45-player SNGs due to the increased minimum bankroll size (which would decrease your buy-in amount).

true poker rewards9-player sit & go with a 10% ROI with a 95% chance to avoid going broke:
      10% x 1,000 tournaments x $1,000/52.0 buy-ins = $1,923

45-player sit & go with a 15% ROI:
      20% x 1,000 tournaments x $1,000/91.2 buy-ins = $2,193

Up to this point we have only been discussing bankroll requirements for tournaments. Calculating bankroll requirements for cash game poker is significantly more complicated because cash games have many more variables. Unlike with tournaments, there are no pre-determined payouts or set number of players. We have always planned to add an additional two articles to this series, but until then, I highly recommend this article on bankroll management as it discusses cash games in much more detail, and includes plenty of tips for managing your cash game bankroll. 

Did you find our tables useful? Are there other tables you would like us to add? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below!

Other Articles

Bogota Poker Rooms

Shark Poker Club Model ThumbnailAlthough the amount of poker in Bogota was disappointing (especially considering the city's population), this was still one of my favorite poker trips. The reasonable prices, excellent dining, friendly people, and abundance of stunningly beautiful women made for a wonderful vacation. Sadly, the locals seem to prefer playing tournaments (and I was looking primarily to play cash games). However, the cash games I managed to find were loose, with plenty of action, but fairly small stakes.

Read more ...

Poker Clothing: Hats, Hoodies, and T-Shirts

Want to look stylish at the poker tables with high quality poker apparel? Want your opponent to look at your branded poker clothing and wonder if you're a sponsored pro? We have scoured the web to find the best poker hats, poker hoodies, poker t-shirts, poker beanies, poker caps, and poker sweatshirts available online, as well as poker clothing specifically for ladies.

Read more ...

PokerStars Rake Increase

poker stars rake increaseSince purchasing the Rational Group in August 2014, the Amaya Gaming Group have implemented plenty of unpopular changes at PokerStars. The latest is to increase PokerStars rake for a variety of games. Click the "read more" button to learn about the rake increases at PokerStars, and whether they will affect you. In addition to discussing the changes implemented by Amaya, we will also highlight the best alternative online poker sites for players adversely affected by these changes.

Read more ...

Jennifer Tilly: The Unabombshell

jennifer tilly pokerMost people recognize Jennifer Tilly from her movie roles in films such as Liar Liar, The Fabulous Baker Boys, and Bride of Chucky. Poker players will recognize her as the busty beauty frequently gracing the tables with her presence, taking down more than her fair share of pots. Unlike many of the other poker beauties we will feature in this series, Jennifer is not just some random hotty who played a poker tournament once. She has cashed in 53 major tournaments, with total winnings of $891,254. 

Read more ...

Tournament Poker Bankroll Calculator

poker bankroll calculatorThe two biggest factors for calculating your minimum tournament bankroll are ROI and tournament field size. In this article, we present tables that not only allow you to easily estimate your required poker bankroll, but also show you why you should be playing smaller tournaments! If you feel you are a winning tournament player, but are not getting the results you feel you deserve, then the problem may be with your bankroll management, not your play.

Read more ...

Panama City Poker Rooms

panama-poker-majestic-casinoOnly 3 casinos in Panama City have active poker games, but each have regular games every night with stakes ranging from $1/$2 to $25/$50. While the rake is excessive, there is plenty of loose action that more than makes up for it. Between the availability of high stakes and the abundance of loose action, Panama City is by far the best place to play poker in Central America.

Read more ...

Santo Domingo Poker Rooms: Playing Poker in the Dominican Republic

Santo Domingo - Dream 400x340There is plenty of poker activity in Santo Domingo, with a wide variety of casinos offering Texas Hold’em, 3-card Hold’em (a Dominican specialty), and Omaha. Between the high rake and incredibly short buy-ins, there is rarely much money on the table, and it is possibly the worst playing environment I have ever encountered. The locals tend to be loud and obnoxious, the dealers have no control over the game, and the poker room managers seem to make up the rules on the fly.

Read more ...

Earn More than 160% Rakeback with ACR & True Poker

acr rakeback the beast️️This may sound like clickbait nonsense, but we will break down exactly how to earn more money from rewards and promotions than you will pay in rake with either Americas Cardroom or True Poker. Not everybody will be able to do so - you will have to play a LOT of poker. Nor are you guaranteed to make money. If you are a losing poker player, then even 160% rakeback may not bring you back to even...but it WILL reduce your losses! To learn how to earn as much as 162% rakeback, click here to read the full article!

Read more ...

Article Contributions

Do you have an article that you would like to contribute? If so, email it to and we may include it on our site!

party poker bonuses mike sexton quote

PartyPoker Download

Has our PartyPoker review convinced you that this is the best online poker site for you? If so, start your PartyPoker download by clicking the button below:

download party poker

If instead we have convinced you that Party Poker is not the best poker site for you, use our official poker rankings to find your best online poker site!

">
0
Shares